>>200
Auto-generated YouTube explanation videos that just read out a Wikipedia page are probably one of the most surreal creations of late capitalism

>>200

dialectics material conditions prole bourgeoisie base superstructure spectacle spook

I'm finally an alpha at something.

Thanks for the kind words, anon! Though we already have an internal list of known bugs and planned features that we need to sponsor before we properly launch, please do let us know if you run into any issues or if there's anything you'd particularly like to see added. Anything security-related should preferably be reported to discap@protonmail.com.

So when is he going to debate Destiny? :^)

>>213
I don't know how anyone takes Destiny seriously or why he keeps landing debates with high-profile academics. He's a shitty debatebro that just sees debate as an opportunity for spectacle, to draw attention to himself. I mean, he literally landed on the map from the JonTron debate, and he's been chasing that high ever since.

>>214
>He's a shitty debatebro that just sees debate as an opportunity for spectacle, to draw attention to himself.
According to our new god The Algorithm, this is excellent.

I'm going to assume this is the meta thread... Consider making thumbnails 250x250 in replies too.

>>231
It's definitely subjective, but we personally found that it looked really chaotic and cluttered to use 250x250 thumbnails for both posts and replies. We took a page from 4chan to halve the size of reply thumbnails. If there's a lot of demand for that though, we could look into making it user-configurable.

no smaller thumbnails in replies looks way better

wash your penis

>>258
Sorry, bucko. The archetypal masculine figure representing cosmic order and lawfulness and culture in the world, and the archetypal motherly masculine figure representing chaos, is an inalienable part of how we construct our societies. If you change it, people wouldn't be human anymore. Also clean your room.

dear anon, would you like to play a game?

wtf wrong post lmao

>>286
is this real? Did they pretend to get hacked for the sake of viral marketing? What stage of capitalism is this?

>>274
If this board turns into Reddit then I'm deleting it immediately.

>>275

If you didn't want this board to turn into Reddit: Chan Edition™, you shouldn't have made this community for the r/chapotraphouse community lol

>>290
It's good promotion, maybe. The worms come out of the woodwork that have nostalgia for the old subreddit from back in its glory days, and that have been disappointed by all the other attempts to succeed it. I've seen a lot of people on Hexbear and the Discord, as well as unrelated communities like /r/RedScarePod, pine for what it used to be. It sets out our goal pretty well, and establishes what type of community we're looking to cultivate (minus any aspects of Reddit culture that leaked in). We'll probably still remove that line eventually though, because it has a lot of negative connotations too, by virtue of even just being a Reddit sub.

>>265
Where are your framed portraits?

I wonder how long the dogs were angry at that... thing

Shrek posting gang represent

>>212
Ehh. The language has been substantially modernized in recent versions. And regarding speed, especially with PHP 8.0 and its new JIT, it's hardly slow anymore. I'd wager it's faster than Python in most scenarios but I don't know if anyone's tried to compare them head-to-head yet.

I'd totally recommend you check out the post on modern PHP from the Vimeo engineering team, they go in-depth on how it's been fighting against its reputation and how it's improved by leaps and bounds in recent years: https://medium.com/vimeo-engineering-blog/its-not-legacy-code-it-s-php-1f0ee0462
580

>>212
yeah this take is a bit dated as >>215 said. Modern php using a framework should be fine

>>216
>using a framework
Oh no.

>>193
always felt like multifile looks really cluttered aesthetically with the implementations of it that I've seen (maybe if you had to click to view the whole gallery), but clipboard upload is a cool idea, I'll definitely look into that

>>194
Multifile looks like ass but is very useful for dumping info like in the screenshots or posting a large number of pdfs, especially when there are captchas/post limits. There probably is a better way to implement it than just spaffing the images all over the page though, it probably stuck because people started making multi image memes

>>195
totally, I'll need to think of what it could look like but multifile is something I'm definitely interested in for the reasons you mention, and if it can be implemented without looking super messy then I'd like to add that ASAP.

>During the 1860s, Ulrichs wrote to Karl Marx and sent him a number of books on Uranian (homosexual/transgender) emancipation, and in 1869 Marx passed one of Ulrichs' books on to Friedrich Engels. Engels responded with disgust to Marx in a private letter, lashing out at "pederasts" who are "extremely against nature", and described Ulrichs' platform of homosexual rights as "turning smut into theory". He worried that things would go badly for heterosexuals like himself should homosexual rights be gained.
>Both Marx and Engels have tangled with the idea of liberty pertaining to love and have made these ideas public. A small time after the death of Marx, Engels had said "that with every great revolutionary movement the question of 'free love' comes to the foreground." This is due to the known rejection of the family institution for the purpose of that free love notion as described by Engels. This would in turn spark much opposition towards the socialist movement by the German government by instituting laws from the mid to late 1800s outlawing any attack whether physical or verbal on the institution of family.
>It is from the work with Marx and the work produced after the death of Marx that Engels had been able to influence a plethora of socialist thinkers as well as those who belong to feminist thinking.
Make up your mind, will ya?

I just think people should generally stop looking to Marx or almost any older theorists for their thoughts on social issues, cause not only did they have little actual understanding of them or culture, they are often disappointing in that regard.

Also, no gods no masters. Also class reductionism is gross.

>>175
Totally. I don't understand the obsession with taking theorists that had good and useful things to say, and then trying to find worth in every single opinion they ever had on every random topic. A solid ideology is formed with the synthesis of theories from many different people which specialized in their given fields. Anything else is just a cult.

more dangerous DPRK jpgs

pixel art brutalism is the way

i'm both the orderer and the guy at the register

>>138
Why are American digestive systems like this?

Don't remind me.

>>145
You're still young and full of life, anon. A spirit full of heart and life doesn't diminish with age but it only grows stronger and burns brighter. Even whenever you feel small, try to remember that you're not even at the top of your game yet. You've got a lot of years left of experience to gain.

mfw

>>125
Is that Ghislaine Maxwell or Anna Khachiyan on the left?

'bouta dox this piece of shit admin. This narrows it down to only 87.3 million people.